From long-standing voices to newer practices, Berlin offers space for fashion to evolve on its own terms.
Berlin Fashion Weekâs strength lies in proximity: to process, to experimentation, to designers shaping a language in real time. More than most fashion weeks, Berlin functions as a space of support and development, where emerging talents are not only presented but also accompanied over time. Backed by the Fashion Council, cultural funding, and a growing institutional network, the week brings together national and international creatives within an environment that allows work to evolve without immediate commercial pressure. Saturday reflected this approach with clarity. The presentations unfolded as a sequence rather than a competition, tracing different trajectories instead of vying for dominance. What emerged was a broad register of practices, showing how fashion can operate when growth, not performance, sets the tempo. Across the day, five distinct positions took shape â each grounded in its own design language, each shaped by context, place, and method
©Andreas Hofrichter
©Andreas Hofrichter
©Andreas Hofrichter
MARKE AW26
MARKE opened the day at M60 with a runway show grounded in discipline and clarity. Designed by Mario Keine, the work unfolded in a space defined by industrial neutrality, allowing the brandâs focus on cut and proportion to come into sharp relief. Jackets were structured without aggression, trousers carried weight without stiffness, and silhouettes maintained a steady, controlled line throughout. The colour palette remained deliberately restrained, keeping attention firmly on construction. Rather than relying on surface or ornament, the collection communicated through repetition and refinement. MARKE does not chase seasonal novelty; instead, it sharpens an existing vocabulary. This continuity reads as confidence. In the context of Berlin Fashion Weekâs emphasis on development, the show positioned authority as something built slowly, through consistency and precision rather than disruption.
©Léa Wormsbach
©Léa Wormsbach
©Léa Wormsbach
William Fan AW26 âRing the Bellâ
William Fan followed, maintaining structural clarity while shifting the emotional register. His runway balanced tailoring with softness, allowing texture and fabric to carry intimacy without sacrificing elegance. Silhouettes remained composed and wearable, yet details – subtle embellishments, tactile surfaces – introduced a sense of closeness. Fanâs strength lies in this in-between space. Ornament and restraint coexist rather than compete, resulting in garments that feel lived-in rather than staged. Casting reinforced this sensibility, suggesting familiarity and community rather than distance. Emotion was present, but never sentimental. Instead, it was grounded firmly in craft. As one of Berlinâs established voices, Fan demonstrated how continuity does not preclude evolution, but can quietly expand its range.
©James Cochrane
©James Cochrane
©James Cochrane
Haderlump AW26 âVariusâ
At the Wintergarten-VarietĂ© on Potsdamer StraĂe, Haderlump transformed runway into tension. The historic venueâlong associated with spectacle and performanceâbecame an active collaborator, amplifying the collectionâs exploration of exposure and control. Under the creative direction of Johann Ehrhardt, fashion here unfolded as a negotiation rather than a statement. Garments appeared assembled rather than resolved. Sheer fabrics met dense knits; leather softened through drape; tailoring interrupted by visible ties and lacing. Many looks felt deliberately held together, foregrounding labour and process. The body was neither fully revealed nor fully protected, but suspended in vulnerability. The theatrical setting intensified this instability. Identity appeared staged, provisional, and constantly negotiated. Rather than offering spectacle for easy consumption, the show sustained discomfort and ambiguity. Haderlump resisted closure, positioning fashion as an ongoing conversation rather than a finished product.
©Andreas Hofrichter
©Andreas Hofrichter
©Andreas Hofrichter
Orange Culture AW26 âBackyards of Memoryâ
Returning to M60, Orange Culture reframed the space through warmth and emotional openness. Founded by Lagos-based designer Adebayo Oke-Lawal, the brandâs exploration of masculinity, vulnerability, and emotional expression remained central to the AW26 collection, Backyards of Memory. Drawing on childhood recollections and domestic spaces, memory here functioned as a source of comfort rather than loss. Fluid silhouettes moved between softness and structure, while draped scarves, elongated coats, and layered textures suggested protection rather than display. Colour operated as emotional punctuation: saturated greens, warm oranges, and pinks cut through the venue’s industrial restraint. Materiality reinforced the narrative. Hand-worked surfaces spoke to care and process, while precise tailoring anchored the collection in clarity. Nostalgia was not romanticised, but activated, carried forward rather than looked back on. Orange Culture positioned tenderness as a source of strength, offering a necessary counterpoint to the surrounding severity and reaffirming the political potential of emotional openness.
©Emil Dietrich
©Emil Dietrich
©Emil Dietrich
Balletshofer AW26 âThe Perfect Candidateâ (Short Film Presentation)
The day concluded with Balletshofer, whose contribution departed from the runway entirely. Instead, the brand presented The Perfect Candidate, a short film screened in a cinema that no longer functions as oneâa space designed for collective attention, now suspended in time. The screening unfolded deliberately. A brief introduction preceded the film, followed by the cast appearing on stage, grounding the cinematic atmosphere in physical presence. In contrast to the habitual choreography of fashion weekâphones raised, moments fragmentedâthe audience was asked to slow down and watch. Directed by emerging filmmaker Mischa Gurevich, whose precise and restrained visual language marked him as an exceptional new voice, the film prioritised emotion over display. Clothing became part of a cinematic system rather than isolated looks. Tailoring functioned as a visual code: uniforms, coats, gloves, and sunglasses evoked control, surveillance, and emotional distance. The cast moved through repetition and stillness, reinforcing themes of conformity and quiet resistance. Here, fashion was not presented as a solution or statement, but as an atmosphereâabsorbed rather than consumed. By choosing stillness over immediacy, Balletshofer reframed the fashion week moment itself, proposing attention as a radical act.
What connected Saturdayâs presentations was not a shared aesthetic, but a shared belief in development. From disciplined tailoring to emotional colour, from theatrical tension to cinematic stillness, the day traced a landscape of practices refining their language in real time. Each show approached fashion from a different position, yet all resisted the urge to resolve or over-explain, allowing uncertainty, vulnerability, and precision to coexist. Berlin Fashion Weekâs strength lies not in delivering polished conclusions, but in making process visible. Here, growth is not something hidden behind branding or scale, but something performed openly, season after season. Watching designers evolve is not incidental in Berlin. It is the pointâand increasingly, it is its quiet power.
©Nicolas Kawohl